DECISION OF THE NFF APPEALS’ COMMITTEE


In Abuja

Handed on 15th July, 2022

In The Following Composition

Barr. Ibrahim Eddy Mark                                              Chairman

Barr. Denen Ikya                                                         Member

Alh. Muazu Hamid                                                      Member

Onoja Joshua, Esq.                                                      Ag. Secretary

On the Enchantment by

Kano Pillars FC                                                          (Appellant)

Represented by

  1. Rabiu Sani

In opposition to

  1. NFF Disciplinary Committee                              (Respondents)
  2. Dakkada Int’l FC

Represented by

  1. Edidiong Stephen
  2. Iberedem Akpan

Concerning the match between Kano Pillars FC v. Dakkada Int’l FC, performed on 23rd June, 2022 at Sani Abacha Stadium, Kano, Kano State.

Findings

  1. The Committee discovered as a proven fact that Kano Pillars FC didn’t problem findings No. 5 of the choice of the NFF Disciplinary Committee, which is the assault on the Asst. Referee 1 by the previous Chairman of Kano Pillars FC.
  2. That Dakkada Int’l FC admitted that their digital camera was not completely destroyed, however the reminiscence card was eliminated and the microphone destroyed, however the recording was saved on the interior reminiscence of the digital camera and similar was forwarded to League Administration Firm and it’s within the League Administration Firm’s file.
  3. The Committee discovered as a proven fact that the League Administration Firm’s letter dated 14th July, 2022, was contemptuous of the NFF Appeals’ and Disciplinary Committees and their consultant, Uche George Egbe, refused to withdraw the letter when demanded by the Appeals’ Committee.

Resolution of the Appeals’ Committee

  1. Discovering No.5 of the Disciplinary Committee, which was not appealed in opposition to by the Appellant, was what the Committee discovered as the principle crux of the disruption of the match by the assault of the Kano Pillars former Chairman on Asst. Referee 1, as proven within the pictorial proof introduced earlier than the Committee. In view of the above, the Enchantment fails. 
  2. On the problem of the destroyed digital camera, the Committee agrees that the reminiscence card was eliminated and the pouch of the microphone was destroyed, as such, this represent harm to property, subsequently, the enchantment fails.
  3. The choice of the Disciplinary Committee is hereby upheld. Consequently, the enchantment is hereby dismissed.
  4. On the League Administration Firm’s letter dated 14th July, 2022, addressed to the Common Secretary, Nigeria Soccer Federation, having discovered that the letter is contemptuous, League Administration Firm is hereby barred from sending such letter to the Nigeria Soccer Federation. League Administration Firm has been cautioned a number of occasions, because the letter was making an attempt to sway the choice of the NFF Appeals’ Committee.
  5. An enchantment in opposition to this resolution shall mislead Courtroom of Arbitration for Sports activities, Lausanne, Switzerland. (Artwork. 70 of NFF Statutes 2010.)

*********************

A request for the bottom of this resolution should be despatched in writing to the NFF Common Secretariat inside 10 days of the receipt of notification of the discovering of the choice. Failure to take action throughout the said deadline will consequence within the resolution turning into binding and ultimate.

DECISION OF THE NFF APPEALS’ COMMITTEE

In Abuja

Handed on 15th July, 2022

In The Following Composition

Barr. Ibrahim Eddy Mark                                              Chairman

Barr. Denen Ikya                                                         Member

Alh. Muazu Hamid                                                      Member

Onoja Joshua, Esq.                                                      Ag. Secretary

On the Enchantment by

  1. Ayatu Muhammad       (Referee)                             (Appellants)
  2. Daramola Olalekan     (Asst. Referee 1)

In opposition to

  1. NFF Disciplinary Committee                              (Respondent)

Concerning the match between Kano Pillars FC v. Dakkada Int’l FC, performed on 23rd June, 2022 at Sani Abacha Stadium, Kano, Kano State.

Findings

  1. The Appeals’ Committee agrees with the submissions of the Referee and the Asst. Referee 1, based mostly on the proof obtainable (Pictorial and Documentary) of the match.

Resolution of the Appeals’ Committee

  1. In view of the Appeals’ Committee’s discovering, we hereby put aside the choice of the Disciplinary Committee, banning the Referee and the Asst. Referee 1.
  2. The Enchantment hereby succeeds and the Committee so maintain.
  3. An enchantment in opposition to this resolution shall mislead Courtroom of Arbitration for Sports activities, Lausanne, Switzerland. (Artwork. 70 of NFF Statutes 2010.)

*********************

A request for the bottom of this resolution should be despatched in writing to the NFF Common Secretariat inside 10 days of the receipt of notification of the discovering of the choice. Failure to take action throughout the said deadline will consequence within the resolution turning into binding and ultimate.

DECISION OF THE NFF APPEALS’ COMMITTEE

In Abuja

Handed on 15th July, 2022

In The Following Composition

Barr. Ibrahim Eddy Mark                                              Chairman

Barr. Denen Ikya                                                         Member

Alh. Muazu Hamid                                                      Member

Onoja Joshua, Esq.                                                      Ag. Secretary

On the Enchantment by

  1.  Huzzein Kabir A. (Referee Assessor )                    (Appellant)

In opposition to

  • NFF Disciplinary Committee                              (Respondent)

Concerning the match between Niger Tornados FC v. Lobi Stars FC, performed on 28th Could, 2022 at ABS Stadium, Kaduna, Kaduna State.

Findings

  1. The Referee Assessor was not invited by the NFF Disciplinary Committee which exhibits that there was no truthful listening to.

Resolution of the Appeals’ Committee

  1. The Enchantment succeeds, and the ban imposed on the match Assessor is hereby reversed, and the Committee so maintain.
  2. An enchantment in opposition to this resolution shall mislead Courtroom of Arbitration for Sports activities, Lausanne, Switzerland. (Artwork. 70 of NFF Statutes 2010.)

*********************

A request for the bottom of this resolution should be despatched in writing to the NFF Common Secretariat inside 10 days of the receipt of notification of the discovering of the choice. Failure to take action throughout the said deadline will consequence within the resolution turning into binding and ultimate.

DECISION OF THE NFF APPEALS’ COMMITTEE

In Abuja

Handed on 15th July, 2022

In The Following Composition

Barr. Ibrahim Eddy Mark                                              Chairman

Barr. Denen Ikya                                                         Member

Alh. Muazu Hamid                                                      Member

Onoja Joshua, Esq.                                                      Ag. Secretary

On the Enchantment by

  1.  Imam Malik Umar (Referee)                                    (Appellant)

In opposition to

  1. NFF Disciplinary Committee                              (Respondent)

Concerning the match between Niger Tornados FC v. Lobi Stars FC, performed on 28th Could, 2022 at ABS Stadium, Kaduna, Kaduna State.

Findings

  1. The Committee discovered as a proven fact that there was actual menace to lives.
  2. The Committee additionally discovered as a proven fact that the above presupposes that there was no ample safety for the match.
  3. Widespread sense subsequently dictates that the match officers discontinue the match.

Resolution of the Appeals’ Committee

  1. In view of the Committee’s findings above, we hereby put aside the choice of the Disciplinary Committee on the Appellants, because the enchantment succeeds.
  2. An enchantment in opposition to this resolution shall mislead Courtroom of Arbitration for Sports activities, Lausanne, Switzerland. (Artwork. 70 of NFF Statutes 2010.)

*********************

A request for the bottom of this resolution should be despatched in writing to the NFF Common Secretariat inside 10 days of the receipt of notification of the discovering of the choice. Failure to take action throughout the said deadline will consequence within the resolution turning into binding and ultimate.

Onoja Joshua, Esq.

Ag. Secretary, NFF Appeals’ Committee

Share



Source_link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.